Refugees versus persons family reunified to a refugee: A comparison of sociodemographic factors, trauma history, baseline psychopathology and treatment effectiveness

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Refugees versus persons family reunified to a refugee : A comparison of sociodemographic factors, trauma history, baseline psychopathology and treatment effectiveness. / Lange, Ane Brøndum; Mortensen, Erik Lykke; Palic, Sabina; Sonne, Charlotte Kærgaard; Carlsson, Jessica.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, Vol. 13, 100586, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lange, AB, Mortensen, EL, Palic, S, Sonne, CK & Carlsson, J 2023, 'Refugees versus persons family reunified to a refugee: A comparison of sociodemographic factors, trauma history, baseline psychopathology and treatment effectiveness', Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, vol. 13, 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100586

APA

Lange, A. B., Mortensen, E. L., Palic, S., Sonne, C. K., & Carlsson, J. (2023). Refugees versus persons family reunified to a refugee: A comparison of sociodemographic factors, trauma history, baseline psychopathology and treatment effectiveness. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, 13, [100586]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100586

Vancouver

Lange AB, Mortensen EL, Palic S, Sonne CK, Carlsson J. Refugees versus persons family reunified to a refugee: A comparison of sociodemographic factors, trauma history, baseline psychopathology and treatment effectiveness. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports. 2023;13. 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100586

Author

Lange, Ane Brøndum ; Mortensen, Erik Lykke ; Palic, Sabina ; Sonne, Charlotte Kærgaard ; Carlsson, Jessica. / Refugees versus persons family reunified to a refugee : A comparison of sociodemographic factors, trauma history, baseline psychopathology and treatment effectiveness. In: Journal of Affective Disorders Reports. 2023 ; Vol. 13.

Bibtex

@article{937705415bb84c52937dc593dc502692,
title = "Refugees versus persons family reunified to a refugee: A comparison of sociodemographic factors, trauma history, baseline psychopathology and treatment effectiveness",
abstract = "Background: No previous studies have focused specifically on comparing refugees with PTSD to persons family reunified to a refugee with PTSD to understand differences with regard to living conditions, emotional distress and treatment outcome. Knowledge on these differences are important to better understand the trauma-affected population and finally whether they might need different treatment protocols. The aim of this study was therefore to examine differences between trauma-affected refugees and trauma-affected persons family reunified. Methods: The sample consisted of 892 patients. Treatment outcome was measured on PTSD, depression symptoms and functioning. The two subsamples defined by migrant background were compared on sociodemographic factors, trauma history, psychopathology and treatment effectiveness. Results: Most significant differences between the two subsamples were found on sociodemographic factors and trauma history with more significant differences in the larger female subsample. The refugee subsamples had more interpersonal trauma compared to the family reunified subsample, but both subsamples had been exposed to many potential stressors and trauma. No significant differences were found on baseline psychopathology or treatment outcome on any of the outcome measures. Limitations: The small sample size of family reunified men might have been the reason for fewer significant results in this population. Also the data had a lack of variables on specific trauma as well as peri- and postimigration factors making it harder to more fully understand the differences between the two subsamples. Conclusion: In conclusion, the results suggest both subsamples suffering from severe mental symptoms and both in need of adequate treatment.",
keywords = "Family reunification, Posttraumatic stress disorder, Predictor, Treatment outcome",
author = "Lange, {Ane Br{\o}ndum} and Mortensen, {Erik Lykke} and Sabina Palic and Sonne, {Charlotte K{\ae}rgaard} and Jessica Carlsson",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100586",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders Reports",
issn = "2666-9153",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Refugees versus persons family reunified to a refugee

T2 - A comparison of sociodemographic factors, trauma history, baseline psychopathology and treatment effectiveness

AU - Lange, Ane Brøndum

AU - Mortensen, Erik Lykke

AU - Palic, Sabina

AU - Sonne, Charlotte Kærgaard

AU - Carlsson, Jessica

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background: No previous studies have focused specifically on comparing refugees with PTSD to persons family reunified to a refugee with PTSD to understand differences with regard to living conditions, emotional distress and treatment outcome. Knowledge on these differences are important to better understand the trauma-affected population and finally whether they might need different treatment protocols. The aim of this study was therefore to examine differences between trauma-affected refugees and trauma-affected persons family reunified. Methods: The sample consisted of 892 patients. Treatment outcome was measured on PTSD, depression symptoms and functioning. The two subsamples defined by migrant background were compared on sociodemographic factors, trauma history, psychopathology and treatment effectiveness. Results: Most significant differences between the two subsamples were found on sociodemographic factors and trauma history with more significant differences in the larger female subsample. The refugee subsamples had more interpersonal trauma compared to the family reunified subsample, but both subsamples had been exposed to many potential stressors and trauma. No significant differences were found on baseline psychopathology or treatment outcome on any of the outcome measures. Limitations: The small sample size of family reunified men might have been the reason for fewer significant results in this population. Also the data had a lack of variables on specific trauma as well as peri- and postimigration factors making it harder to more fully understand the differences between the two subsamples. Conclusion: In conclusion, the results suggest both subsamples suffering from severe mental symptoms and both in need of adequate treatment.

AB - Background: No previous studies have focused specifically on comparing refugees with PTSD to persons family reunified to a refugee with PTSD to understand differences with regard to living conditions, emotional distress and treatment outcome. Knowledge on these differences are important to better understand the trauma-affected population and finally whether they might need different treatment protocols. The aim of this study was therefore to examine differences between trauma-affected refugees and trauma-affected persons family reunified. Methods: The sample consisted of 892 patients. Treatment outcome was measured on PTSD, depression symptoms and functioning. The two subsamples defined by migrant background were compared on sociodemographic factors, trauma history, psychopathology and treatment effectiveness. Results: Most significant differences between the two subsamples were found on sociodemographic factors and trauma history with more significant differences in the larger female subsample. The refugee subsamples had more interpersonal trauma compared to the family reunified subsample, but both subsamples had been exposed to many potential stressors and trauma. No significant differences were found on baseline psychopathology or treatment outcome on any of the outcome measures. Limitations: The small sample size of family reunified men might have been the reason for fewer significant results in this population. Also the data had a lack of variables on specific trauma as well as peri- and postimigration factors making it harder to more fully understand the differences between the two subsamples. Conclusion: In conclusion, the results suggest both subsamples suffering from severe mental symptoms and both in need of adequate treatment.

KW - Family reunification

KW - Posttraumatic stress disorder

KW - Predictor

KW - Treatment outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100586

DO - 10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100586

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85156188676

VL - 13

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders Reports

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders Reports

SN - 2666-9153

M1 - 100586

ER -

ID: 347936761