Hyperglycaemia, diabetes and risk of fragility fractures: observational and Mendelian randomisation studies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Hyperglycaemia, diabetes and risk of fragility fractures : observational and Mendelian randomisation studies. / Emanuelsson, Frida; Afzal, Shoaib; Jørgensen, Niklas R.; Nordestgaard, Børge G.; Benn, Marianne.

In: Diabetologia, Vol. 67, No. 2, 2024, p. 301-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Emanuelsson, F, Afzal, S, Jørgensen, NR, Nordestgaard, BG & Benn, M 2024, 'Hyperglycaemia, diabetes and risk of fragility fractures: observational and Mendelian randomisation studies', Diabetologia, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-06054-8

APA

Emanuelsson, F., Afzal, S., Jørgensen, N. R., Nordestgaard, B. G., & Benn, M. (2024). Hyperglycaemia, diabetes and risk of fragility fractures: observational and Mendelian randomisation studies. Diabetologia, 67(2), 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-06054-8

Vancouver

Emanuelsson F, Afzal S, Jørgensen NR, Nordestgaard BG, Benn M. Hyperglycaemia, diabetes and risk of fragility fractures: observational and Mendelian randomisation studies. Diabetologia. 2024;67(2):301-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-06054-8

Author

Emanuelsson, Frida ; Afzal, Shoaib ; Jørgensen, Niklas R. ; Nordestgaard, Børge G. ; Benn, Marianne. / Hyperglycaemia, diabetes and risk of fragility fractures : observational and Mendelian randomisation studies. In: Diabetologia. 2024 ; Vol. 67, No. 2. pp. 301-311.

Bibtex

@article{b7604fd4523d45f4b204f68f05add33f,
title = "Hyperglycaemia, diabetes and risk of fragility fractures: observational and Mendelian randomisation studies",
abstract = "Aims/hypothesis: Fragility fractures may be a complication of diabetes, partly caused by chronic hyperglycaemia. We hypothesised that: (1) individuals with hyperglycaemia and diabetes have increased risk of fragility fracture; (2) hyperglycaemia is causally associated with increased risk of fragility fracture; and (3) diabetes and fragility fracture jointly associate with the highest risk of all-cause mortality. Methods: In total, 117,054 individuals from the Copenhagen City Heart Study and the Copenhagen General Population Study (the Copenhagen studies) and 390,374 individuals from UK Biobank were included for observational and one-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses. Fragility fractures were defined as fractures at the hip, spine and arm (humerus/wrist), collected from national health registries. Summary data for fasting glucose and HbA1c concentrations from 196,743 individuals in the Meta-Analyses of Glucose and Insulin-related traits Consortium (MAGIC) were combined with data on fragility fractures from the Copenhagen studies in two-sample MR analyses. Results: Higher fasting and non-fasting glucose and HbA1c concentrations were associated with higher risk of any fragility fracture (p<0.001). Individuals with vs without diabetes had HRs for fragility fracture of 1.50 (95% CI 1.19, 1.88) in type 1 diabetes and 1.22 (1.13, 1.32) in type 2 diabetes. One-sample MR supported a causal association between high non-fasting glucose concentrations and increased risk of arm fracture in the Copenhagen studies and UK Biobank combined (RR 1.41 [1.11, 1.79], p=0.004), with similar results for fasting glucose and HbA1c in two-sample MR analyses (ORs 1.50 [1.03, 2.18], p=0.03; and 2.79 [1.12, 6.93], p=0.03, respectively). The corresponding MR estimates for any fragility fracture were 1.18 (1.00, 1.41), p=0.06; 1.36 (0.89, 2.09), p=0.15; and 2.47 (0.95, 6.43), p=0.06, respectively. At age 80 years, cumulative death was 27% in individuals with fragility fracture only, 54% in those with diabetes only, 67% in individuals with both conditions and 17% in those with neither. Conclusions/interpretation: Hyperglycaemia and diabetes are risk factors for fragility fracture and one- and two-sample MR analyses supported a causal effect of hyperglycaemia on arm fractures. Diabetes and previous fragility fracture jointly conferred the highest risk of death in the general population. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].",
keywords = "Fragility fracture, Hyperglycaemia, Mendelian randomisation, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes",
author = "Frida Emanuelsson and Shoaib Afzal and J{\o}rgensen, {Niklas R.} and Nordestgaard, {B{\o}rge G.} and Marianne Benn",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s).",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1007/s00125-023-06054-8",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "301--311",
journal = "Diabetologia",
issn = "0012-186X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hyperglycaemia, diabetes and risk of fragility fractures

T2 - observational and Mendelian randomisation studies

AU - Emanuelsson, Frida

AU - Afzal, Shoaib

AU - Jørgensen, Niklas R.

AU - Nordestgaard, Børge G.

AU - Benn, Marianne

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Aims/hypothesis: Fragility fractures may be a complication of diabetes, partly caused by chronic hyperglycaemia. We hypothesised that: (1) individuals with hyperglycaemia and diabetes have increased risk of fragility fracture; (2) hyperglycaemia is causally associated with increased risk of fragility fracture; and (3) diabetes and fragility fracture jointly associate with the highest risk of all-cause mortality. Methods: In total, 117,054 individuals from the Copenhagen City Heart Study and the Copenhagen General Population Study (the Copenhagen studies) and 390,374 individuals from UK Biobank were included for observational and one-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses. Fragility fractures were defined as fractures at the hip, spine and arm (humerus/wrist), collected from national health registries. Summary data for fasting glucose and HbA1c concentrations from 196,743 individuals in the Meta-Analyses of Glucose and Insulin-related traits Consortium (MAGIC) were combined with data on fragility fractures from the Copenhagen studies in two-sample MR analyses. Results: Higher fasting and non-fasting glucose and HbA1c concentrations were associated with higher risk of any fragility fracture (p<0.001). Individuals with vs without diabetes had HRs for fragility fracture of 1.50 (95% CI 1.19, 1.88) in type 1 diabetes and 1.22 (1.13, 1.32) in type 2 diabetes. One-sample MR supported a causal association between high non-fasting glucose concentrations and increased risk of arm fracture in the Copenhagen studies and UK Biobank combined (RR 1.41 [1.11, 1.79], p=0.004), with similar results for fasting glucose and HbA1c in two-sample MR analyses (ORs 1.50 [1.03, 2.18], p=0.03; and 2.79 [1.12, 6.93], p=0.03, respectively). The corresponding MR estimates for any fragility fracture were 1.18 (1.00, 1.41), p=0.06; 1.36 (0.89, 2.09), p=0.15; and 2.47 (0.95, 6.43), p=0.06, respectively. At age 80 years, cumulative death was 27% in individuals with fragility fracture only, 54% in those with diabetes only, 67% in individuals with both conditions and 17% in those with neither. Conclusions/interpretation: Hyperglycaemia and diabetes are risk factors for fragility fracture and one- and two-sample MR analyses supported a causal effect of hyperglycaemia on arm fractures. Diabetes and previous fragility fracture jointly conferred the highest risk of death in the general population. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

AB - Aims/hypothesis: Fragility fractures may be a complication of diabetes, partly caused by chronic hyperglycaemia. We hypothesised that: (1) individuals with hyperglycaemia and diabetes have increased risk of fragility fracture; (2) hyperglycaemia is causally associated with increased risk of fragility fracture; and (3) diabetes and fragility fracture jointly associate with the highest risk of all-cause mortality. Methods: In total, 117,054 individuals from the Copenhagen City Heart Study and the Copenhagen General Population Study (the Copenhagen studies) and 390,374 individuals from UK Biobank were included for observational and one-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses. Fragility fractures were defined as fractures at the hip, spine and arm (humerus/wrist), collected from national health registries. Summary data for fasting glucose and HbA1c concentrations from 196,743 individuals in the Meta-Analyses of Glucose and Insulin-related traits Consortium (MAGIC) were combined with data on fragility fractures from the Copenhagen studies in two-sample MR analyses. Results: Higher fasting and non-fasting glucose and HbA1c concentrations were associated with higher risk of any fragility fracture (p<0.001). Individuals with vs without diabetes had HRs for fragility fracture of 1.50 (95% CI 1.19, 1.88) in type 1 diabetes and 1.22 (1.13, 1.32) in type 2 diabetes. One-sample MR supported a causal association between high non-fasting glucose concentrations and increased risk of arm fracture in the Copenhagen studies and UK Biobank combined (RR 1.41 [1.11, 1.79], p=0.004), with similar results for fasting glucose and HbA1c in two-sample MR analyses (ORs 1.50 [1.03, 2.18], p=0.03; and 2.79 [1.12, 6.93], p=0.03, respectively). The corresponding MR estimates for any fragility fracture were 1.18 (1.00, 1.41), p=0.06; 1.36 (0.89, 2.09), p=0.15; and 2.47 (0.95, 6.43), p=0.06, respectively. At age 80 years, cumulative death was 27% in individuals with fragility fracture only, 54% in those with diabetes only, 67% in individuals with both conditions and 17% in those with neither. Conclusions/interpretation: Hyperglycaemia and diabetes are risk factors for fragility fracture and one- and two-sample MR analyses supported a causal effect of hyperglycaemia on arm fractures. Diabetes and previous fragility fracture jointly conferred the highest risk of death in the general population. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

KW - Fragility fracture

KW - Hyperglycaemia

KW - Mendelian randomisation

KW - Type 1 diabetes

KW - Type 2 diabetes

U2 - 10.1007/s00125-023-06054-8

DO - 10.1007/s00125-023-06054-8

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38095658

AN - SCOPUS:85179725245

VL - 67

SP - 301

EP - 311

JO - Diabetologia

JF - Diabetologia

SN - 0012-186X

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 380215473